Re: [PROPOSAL] Origin and Bugs support

2000-11-27 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
i was wrong. My main concern was just getting this feature. I apologize for the mistake. BTW, wrong thread. And why doesn't anyone have anything to say about my proposal? -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer Progeny Linux Systems - http://progeny.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Origin and Bugs support

2000-11-27 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 04:23:09 + (UTC), aj@azure.humbug.org.au (Anthony Towns) said: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:51:32PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, > Jr. wrote: >> I agree with this, and this is what prompted my original >> followup. This seems like a win for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Origin and Bugs support

2000-11-26 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
rived distribution intercepting bug reports. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer Progeny Linux Systems - http://progeny.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Origin and Bugs support

2000-11-26 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
Debian should know about. Obviously this can be done > without or without your implied functionality, but I don't > think we want to support this within Debian. I agree. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer Progeny Linux Systems - http://progeny.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Origin and Bugs support

2000-11-26 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
with things that aren't their fault. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer Progeny Linux Systems - http://progeny.com

Bug#78014: [PROPOSAL] dpkg Build Directory

2000-11-25 Thread Eric Gillespie Jr.
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.2.1.0 Severity: normal Let me start by saying that i am not in any way attached to this specific amendment to policy. What i would like is to be able to cause the files that are normally placed in the parent directory while building a package to be placed instead

PROPOSAL: dpkg Build Directory

2000-11-22 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
need to be modified. It doesn't support a build directory at the moment. I describe the '-o' option in this patch, but i am not attached to that particular one. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer Progeny Linux Systems - http://progeny.com build-dir.diff.gz Description: Binary data

Re: Use $DEB_BUILD_DIR rather than parent directory?

2000-11-22 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:39:48 + (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wichert Akkerman) said: > No tool should try to second-guess the user. Eh? It isn't. The user *told* dpkg to do this by setting the variable. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer Progeny

Re: Use $DEB_BUILD_DIR rather than parent directory?

2000-11-20 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
st have dpkg override that final parameter with $DEB_BUILD_DIR? If someone sets this variable, they clearly want the files to go there and not '..'. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer Progeny Linux Systems - http://progeny.com

Use $DEB_BUILD_DIR rather than parent directory?

2000-11-20 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
. If it isn't, they will continue their current behavior of dropping them in the parent directory. I know nothing about the internals of these programs, but it seems like a fairly simple change. I would be willing to volunteer some time for this, if necessary. -- Eric Gillespie, Jr. &