On Monday 13 May 2002 03:22, Jim Pick wrote:
> Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses
> for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time
> compilation (.java to .so) at install time. Is this automatic enough
> under gcj so that this could that
On Sunday 12 May 2002 22:00, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:40:05PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > I disagree on that class files should be placed in a -dev package for the
> > same reason as I want every jar file to be placed in /usr/share/java
> > (maybe with an exception for
On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:32, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:11, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > > Only if your binary package can run with free virtual machines (like
> > > kaffe, libgcj,
On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:11, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Only if your binary package can run with free virtual machines (like kaffe,
> libgcj, ORP and KissMe), it may go into main. Otherwise, it must go into
> non-free, or in contrib if your package itself is free.
Better:
Only if yo
On Sunday 12 May 2002 17:11, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If your binary package can run only with non-free virtual machines
> (the only free Java virtual machine seems to be kaffe - and the one
> included in libgcj), it cannot go to main. If your package i
On Saturday 02 June 2001 18:33, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 1.VI.2001 at 14:00 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > The real problem of Unicode is that still there is not enough support
> > for it. And at least for a few years 8-bit encodings are going to be
>
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: normal
Currently, sections 3.2.1 and 2.3.1 both give rules for package naming.
The latter is, however, more strict, and both use different terminology.
I suggest these two get synchronized and both be evenly strict.
I checked the version on the we
Op zondag 11 maart 2001 07:20, schreef Drew Parsons:
> I therefore wonder if it would not be more appropriate to call this
> subsection "science" rather than "math" ?
I agree. That would make sense. /Me is also a chemist, and noticed
this before. I think science/math and science/social etc would b
8 matches
Mail list logo
