Bug#646166: § 2.2.1: clarify why "must not require" includes Recommends

2011-10-21 Thread David Paleino
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist Version: 3.9.2.0 Hello, section § 2.2.1 of the Policy reads as follows: [..] the packages in main: - must not require a package outside of main for compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare a "Depends", "Recommends", or

Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives

2008-02-24 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:01:36 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > David Paleino writes ("Re: Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use > alternatives"): > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:49:48 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > I think neither program should be using the genera

Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives

2008-02-24 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:49:48 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > David Paleino writes ("Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use > alternatives"): > > translate [-niwvh] [-l languages] [words to translate] > ... > > ntranslate {-? | -v | --list-services} > >

Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives

2008-02-22 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:31:46 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use > alternatives"): > > libtranslate-bin actually provides a user program that goes in /usr/bin. > > The confusing name is because the binary is just a wrapper around the

Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives

2008-02-10 Thread David Paleino
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.7.3.0 Severity: normal Policy 10.1 isn't really clear on when to use alternatives: /--- | Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality | but with the same filenames. (The case of two programs having the same | functionality but di