Re: Proposed official virtual packages - todo and todo.txt

2020-12-14 Thread Dave Steele
Update. No todo, and suggest the following for todo.txt text: command-line task management utility compatible with todo.txt CLI ( http://todotxt.org) On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:57 PM Dave Steele wrote: > Please update the Authoritative List of Virtual Package Names to > include &quo

Bug#976402: Bug#976902: topydo: provides /usr/bin/todo with incompatible interface compared to devtodo

2020-12-09 Thread Dave Steele
I see two complaints about the "todo" virtual package: 1) it encompasses applications that may not have sufficiently identical interfaces, and/or 2) it uses Conflicts as a transition mechanism. Resolving (2) exceeds my threshold. I'll drop the todo package. That leaves todo.txt, implemented b

Bug#976402: Bug#976902: topydo: provides /usr/bin/todo with incompatible interface compared to devtodo

2020-12-09 Thread Dave Steele
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:40 PM Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:00:23PM -0500, Dave Steele wrote: > > /usr/bin/todo is not registered as an alternative by devtodo, > so you cannot register it as an alternative in another package. > The conflict between devtod

Bug#976402: Bug#976902: topydo: provides /usr/bin/todo with incompatible interface compared to devtodo

2020-12-09 Thread Dave Steele
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:54 AM Ansgar wrote: > Package: topydo > Version: 0.13-5 > Severity: serious > > Example use of `todo` from devtodo: > > +--- > | Add a task, like so: > | > | $ todo -a I should really update my homepage > | > | List all open tasks: > | > | $ todo > | > | Mark a task as co

Proposed official virtual packages - todo and todo.txt

2020-12-08 Thread Dave Steele
Please update the Authoritative List of Virtual Package Names to include "todo" and "todo.txt". Discussion of the change is documented in [#976402]. [#976402]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976402 Suggested content: # Miscellaneous virtualPackages: - name: todo descr