Bug#633797: copyright-format: "with exception" underspecified

2011-11-25 Thread Craig Small
rt name. wrt the other email I saw after this one; it's not policy yet and wasn't in policy for precisely last-minute-tweaking sort of reasons. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csm

Bug#633797: copyright-format: "with exception" underspecified

2011-11-16 Thread Craig Small
a consensus for this position? FWIW I think it's a sensible solution to it. The cases where there is more than one exception are probably quite rare and are effectively their own license in any case. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debia

Bug#268377: Bug#291939: Support for arch aliases

2005-01-24 Thread Craig Small
program that was integrated into dpkg and/or the buildds was working, we wouldn't have this problem. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer csmall at

Bug#183572: debian-policy: Documents are not useful from a practical standpoint

2003-03-05 Thread Craig Small
Package: debian-policy Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-06 Severity: normal I'm not sure if this is a policy problem or a website problem or someone else's problem. As the dh-make maintainer, I often have to check that dh-make is doing the right thing. This means that I try to follow polic

Re: init.d scripts and LSB

2002-05-06 Thread Craig Small
her, I think they are going to be similar as the existing BSDs. That would make sense. I'm trying to see for GNU/Linux if LSB should be followed and if so is it a SHOULD or a MUST. I'm getting the impression it is a should. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF

init.d scripts and LSB

2002-05-05 Thread Craig Small
ainer as a lot of people use it to make their own packages so I like to get it right. I'm not on debian-policy, so please CC me. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/<[EMAIL PROT

Bug#75988: Chapter 7 should suggest to use URLs

2000-10-31 Thread Craig Small
Package: packaging-manual Version: 3.2.1.0 Severity: wishlist One of the top-ten requests we get in webmaster email is can we put URLs of the packages home page into the package page. We grab the information for the package page from the package's description field, so.. I think it would be a ni

Re: .Z files in debian packages

1998-11-22 Thread Craig Small
cy on this issue? Some programs come with files that are already compressed upstream. It is a bit wierd for this to be done, especially considering most upstream files are tar and gzipped. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 |@work: [EMAIL PROT

Bug#25622: dh-make: the copyright template should have an entry for the upstream author (fwd)

1998-08-11 Thread Craig Small
ifications: Upstream Authors: ... Debian maintainer: ... I'll leave the question about lintian alone. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 |@work: [EMAIL PROTECTED],@play: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| |@home: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: #24510: procmail: procmail creates mailboxes with mode 660

1998-07-14 Thread Craig Small
our mailbox. They generally don't run as root. At least in my inetd.conf: smtp stream tcp nowait mail/usr/sbin/exim exim -bs - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 |@work: [EMAIL PROTECTED],@play: [EMAIL P

Re: need input: essential packages and pre-depends

1998-03-24 Thread Craig Small
why they are not. It seems that the policy on how to determine if a package is Essential may need some work, otherwise we would of all been able to say "of course it is (not)". - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 |@wor

Re: need input: essential packages and pre-depends

1998-03-24 Thread Craig Small
her was psmisc. > If nobody objects, I will report this as a bug, and will ask the > maintainer to use a Pre-Depends field for libc6 (which is the only I object, unless there is a clear decision on this mail list that it should be essential. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63

Re: Apology to the authors of helper packages

1998-03-16 Thread Craig Small
back upon what I've just written, I'm wondering... why is > this still being discussed in debian-policy, anyway? The issue of debhelper scripts came up on here. As Manoj? said, I think, the debhelper scripts can be thought of as an implementation of the Debian policy. - Craig

Re: Apology to the authors of helper packages

1998-03-16 Thread Craig Small
policies are imcomplete". I think a lot of us have forgotten the developers out there, trying to package stuff correctly but not sure how. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 |@work: [EMAIL PROTECTED],@play: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| |@hom

Deb Policy: between 2.3.0.1 and 2.4.0.0

1998-03-09 Thread Craig Small
what's the difference? Or should I just bump up the version number and wait for the bug reports? - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 |@work: [EMAIL PROTECTED],@play: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| |@home: [EMAIL PROTECTED], @debian:[