On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> b) if you know what you are doing, compile the packages by hand, fix their
> install scripts, and remove the conflicts. You are trying to circumvent the
> norm.
But I think, to be fair, that what he's proposing *isn't* necessarily
`not the norm'
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> Perhaps there are people who want a "service enabled by default" policy,
> and perhaps we should accomodate them. However, I'm not one of them
> and I don't want any services turned on on some of my machines without
> my explicit ok.
Yes, and I think thi
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Clint Adams wrote:
> They both provide httpd; should I file bugs against them demanding that
> they conflict with it too?
I think this is a good point; it doesn't seem to be a clear area
of policy. It sounds like perhaps some new system needs to be
implemented. Perhaps a Su
3 matches
Mail list logo
