There are at least two possible ways in which commercial organizations
might release .debs: (1) via non-free on the debian distribution sites,
and (2) by putting the .debs on their commercial CDs and/or their own
web sites. Obviously, the debian project can exercise some control over
the former
, and removing packages
be documented.
On Mon, 7 Sep 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 1998, Bill Mitchell wrote:
>
> > On 6 Sep 1998, Guy Maor wrote:
> > > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > On Sun, 6 Sep 1998, Gene McCulley wrote:
>
On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Hm, does anyone knows what is VISUAL exactly intendend for ? I'm
> thinking of some setting like `EDITOR=ed' and `VISUAL=vi'. If it's
> really what was meant for a use of VISUAL, I'd say it's not needed any
> more ...
Checking man pages and doc files f
> > That is correct, 'tempfile' is Debian specific, and we also ship a similar
> > utility from OpenBSD called 'mktemp', I have no idea if other systems also
> > have 'mktemp' utilities.
> The glibcbug script in glibc 2.1 already uses mktemp.
Perhaps the `tempfile' name was a bad choice. Should
On Sun, 14 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > You may mark this bug as forwarded and make a link of tzconfig.8 to
> > undocumented(7), following policy.
> >
> This policy has created one of the most cluttered, ugly, and useless,
> method of dealing with the lack of man pages.
>
> It doesn't cre
5 matches
Mail list logo
