Re: alternative dependency ordering - with respect of packages in main

2011-09-21 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 20/09/11 06:24 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > In my intended case I believe they always end up with foo from main, > only if they choose foo-contrib will they get it, which is how I think > it should be. main should not reference packages from contrib/non-free > in any way. If that's how it works, then

Re: alternative dependency ordering - with respect of packages in main

2011-09-20 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 09/20/2011 08:43 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Package: bar > Depends: foo > > Package: foo-contrib > Provides: foo While that neatly sidesteps the issue, 7.5 says: To specify which of a set of real packages should be the default to

Bug#361418: [Proposal] new Debian menu structure

2006-04-14 Thread Ben Armstrong
The pkg-games project has discussed in the past that "Arcade" is a poor category, and yet it is preserved in this new menu proposal. The thread starts here: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/2006-January/47.html Please note that since that time, we have moved back to t

Maintainer scripts chapter a hard read

2001-12-24 Thread Ben Armstrong
Please CC me on all replies as I am not subscribed to this list. In case you haven't guessed by now, I'm doing a complete read of Policy front to back, something which in all these years of being with Debian I have never done. I'm wondering how many other DDs are in the same position. I will cer

The meaning of "must not modify" wrt. passwd, shadow etc.

2001-12-24 Thread Ben Armstrong
Please CC me on all replies as I am not subscribed to this list. In Debian Policy 3.5.6.0 section 10.2.1 it says: Packages other than base-passwd must not modify /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/group or /etc/gshadow. This is followed by a discussion about how packages can modify these fil

Fuzzy explanation for cron.d scripts not handled by anacron

2001-12-24 Thread Ben Armstrong
Please CC me on all replies as I am not on this list. Debian Policy 3.5.6.0 section 10.5 says: (Note that entries in the `/etc/cron.d' directory are not handled by `anacron'. Thus, you should only use this directory for jobs which may be skipped if the system is not running.) I f

Bug#126131: debian-policy: Errors in section 9.1 footnote 3

2001-12-21 Thread Ben Armstrong
do/does/ or s/to do/determines/ And: "A package should needs to depend on the libraries it directly uses ..." s/should // Thanks, Ben Armstrong -- ,-. nSLUGhttp://www.nslug.ns.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] \`' Debian http://www.debian.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] `

Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1

2001-12-08 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:50:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 09:08:16AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > In policy section 2.3.8.1 there are two inconsistent spellings of the > > word "dependencies" as "dependancies". While c

Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1

2001-12-08 Thread Ben Armstrong
it should be fixed to make it consistent. Thanks, Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux sanctuary 2.4.14 #1 Mon Nov 12 12:36:47 AST 2001 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages deb