Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL

2001-08-30 Thread Ari Makela
llow it. I'm going to write a new file which says that /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL should have GPL version 2 and if it doesn't doesn't the user can get it from foo. If someone thinks this is a bad idea I'm open to other ideas. -- #!/usr/bin/perl -w -- Ar

Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL

2001-08-30 Thread Ari Makela
ndation. This implies that "or later" is not mandatory. -- #!/usr/bin/perl -w -- Ari Makela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # # http://arska.org/hauva/ # # "Sailing is, after all, a kind of grace, a kind of magic." - Phil Berman

Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL

2001-08-30 Thread Ari Makela
Jonathan D. Proulx writes: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:12:41AM +0300, Ari Makela wrote: > $ head -3 /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE >Version 2, June 1991 Yes, indeed, but that's not what I ment. I'

Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL

2001-08-30 Thread Ari Makela
#!/usr/bin/perl -w -- Ari Makela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # # http://arska.org/hauva/ # # "Sailing is, after all, a kind of grace, a kind of magic." - Phil Berman