Bug#530687: debian-policy: Please provide policy for architecture wildcards

On Wednesday 27 May 2009 17:22:19 Andrew McMillan wrote: > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 14:33 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > > > > Current policy has this wording and I didn't want to change that, so > > > > yes, it's on purpose. > > > > > > Not quite.

Re: Architecture in *.dsc files

On Wednesday 27 May 2009 14:19:02 Russ Allbery wrote: > Andres Mejia writes: > > Perhaps inclusive 'or' is meant here. That's the impression I get from > > reading this. > > > > Perhaps a footnote saying "Here 'or' is meant inclusively&qu

Bug#530687: debian-policy: Please provide policy for architecture wildcards

On Wednesday 27 May 2009 07:49:09 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 07:30:57 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 May 2009 06:51:58 Julien Cristau wrote: > > > This makes it sound like you can't mix architecture names and > > > architectur

Re: Architecture in *.dsc files

On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:04:19 Russ Allbery wrote: > Jonathan Yu writes: > > This is probably a stupid question, but... > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Currently, Policy's description of Architecture includes the statement: > >> > >>In the main debian/con

Bug#530687: debian-policy: Please provide policy for architecture wildcards

On Wednesday 27 May 2009 06:51:58 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 18:50:42 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > > @@ -2723,7 +2725,8 @@ Package: libc6 > > In the main debian/control file in the source > > package, or in the source package control file

Bug#530687: debian-policy: Please provide policy for architecture wildcards

Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.1.0 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Support for architecture wildcards has been added to dpkg-1.13.13, yet there's no clear policy as to how architecture wildcards should be used for other tools such as sbuild and pbuilder. There has been recent discussions abou

Bug#466550: Please clarify the get-orig-source target stated in Policy 4.9

I would like to add what Russ Allbery wrote. On Tuesday 19 February 2008 1:47:25 am Russ Allbery wrote: . . . > Personally, I've always read it has emphasizing an entirely different part > than what people are talking about here. Rather than focusing on the > current version bit, I always focuse

Bug#460486: debian-policy: Section 10.1 as a mistake in example makefile snippet.

On Jan 12, 2008 11:56 PM, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:22:41PM -0500, Andres Mejia wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.7.3 > > Tags: patch > > > > Debian Policy Section 10.1 contains the following makef

Bug#460486: debian-policy: Section 10.1 as a mistake in example makefile snippet.

ng nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s endif -- Regards, Andres Mejia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]