ollow procedure to get your idea acted on:
-> file a bug report against policy, *including an appropriate diff*
-> Cc the report to this list...
if you can get consensus, then get policy amended and file a report against
lintian.
I'll be one of your seconds if you do this.
--
..Aaron Va
dy know about it....
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
Others will look to you for stability, so hide when you bite your nails.
is
raised one way or another on this subject, I will retract this objection.
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
rator could then
make any changes he deemed useful to the default configuration.
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
like to point something out. My original message was referring
to the *original version* of *ben's* proposal, not the autobuilder gcc
sit-in hack. In my mind the latter shouldn't even be considered.
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin:
27;s ad-hoc beaurocratic process. Let's
just push this one through, people! (Ben, you can consider this a second...)
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
There are three kinds of people in this world: those who can count and
those who can't.
good
reason; I just can't see it ;)
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
There are three kinds of people in this world: those who can count and
those who can't.
Just to clarify for Joey, I seconded this proposal in my last message.
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
There are three kinds of people in
away with this confusion?
If it's still needed, I second this proposal.
Also, if I'm not mistaken, our social contract acgnowledges the existence of
non-free software, even admits that it's necessary sometimes. Who are we to
dictate what others use? Shouldn't we distribute that softw
here as well.
I officially second this proposal.
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
There are three kinds of people in this world: those wh
r md5sums should
be required. A proposal was attempted I believe, but didn't make it. Please
look back in the archives, don't open this pandora's box again unless it's
necessary.
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin:
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 09:40:01AM -0700, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 11:27:49PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 02:10:27AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > PROPOSAL
> > >
> > >
> > > (1
does not recommend -e to be the default.
> 1.c) dpkg-architecture defaults to set not only the arch env variables, but
> also MAKEFLAGS += -e
I second approach 1c.
1b sounds hackish, and 1a and 2 require too many changes. But this is
something that needs to happen
--
..Aaron Van Cou
is conversation? Only if you've got time to do it
though. :)
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
"...Nothing astonishes men so much as c
that.
This is a good idea because: What if Hurd were suddenly forked, and some new
OS appeared under a different microkernel? If this OS still bore the name
Hurd, and the Hurd code was eventually merged to be source compatible with
multiple MK's, *then* what would happen???
We just
y can be reverted
and defaults can be set as you suggest. Everything that does not yet conform
to this area of policy gets a bug.
This is simply a basic tenet of wide-scale project management.
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: ht
lementing (b) anyway
> then.
>
> Maybe we can get an entry in the Guiness book of records for the archive
> with the most symlinks?
What kind of proposals have come forth to somewhat flatten the ftp archives?
If none have I have a few ideas in mind...
--
..Aaron Van Cou
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 08:59:19PM +0100, Vincent Renardias wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Le Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:29:38PM -0800, Aaron Van Couwenberghe écrivait:
> > > If there were a group that, during freeze, were given the task of
task of
handling difficult looking bugs before they became stale, debian could
possibly begin getting its releases out on time.
I'm just curious, is there such an organization within debian at
this time?
--
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
B
19 matches
Mail list logo
