In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manoj Srivastava
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Do we have the right to deprive users of choices just because
> we see no reason to do stuff? Sounds a trifle draconian.
Uhm - putting TIK into contrib doesn't "deprive users of choices", it only
slims down main
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Carter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I ask you again, is a perl script which reads freshmeat only good enough
>for contrib because scoop hasn't published sources to his CGIs?
Hu? You don't access Freshmeat over the free protocol HTTP? Funny.
To be specific: a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After that it is not terribly bad.. But definately not something I would
>wish on someone who does not understand mail.
Uhm - someone who doesn't understand mail shouldn't fiddle around with
_any_ MTA. Far to dangerous. S
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Hands) wrote:
>I licence all my own code under a DFSG compliant licence, how can I ever get
>shafted by the licences ?
You can't like a GPL library to a BSD program and keept that resulting
program under BSD license, for example. Both lic
4 matches
Mail list logo
