Am Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:56:56PM +0100 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > What I'm actually imagine is that the time I need to write this kind of
> > mails I could perfectly use to convert 2-3 d/copyright files from old
> > format to DEP5. And now I'm wondering why I'm not doing so ...
>
> Do not slow
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:41:39PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
)
> > > I personally would rather think that excluding files from the upstream
> > > source is a pretty good reason to make DEP5 mandatory *for these cases*.
> > > Besides a sensible way of documentation it saves maintainer time to
> >
Hi Bill,
Am Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:00:36AM +0100 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 09:08:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > It should be possible to use it with the plain old copyright format too,
> > > otherwise we are kind of renegating on our promise that the machine
> > >
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 09:08:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It should be possible to use it with the plain old copyright format too,
> > otherwise we are kind of renegating on our promise that the machine
> > readable copyright format be optionnal.
>
> Did we ever promised this?
Hi,
Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:25:31PM +0100 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > > +
> > > +These types of files, or any others that Debian does not want to
> > > +include in our archive, must be stripped from the upstream
> > > tarball
> > > +prior to uploading. The Files-E
5 matches
Mail list logo
