Hi,
Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 02:52:18PM -0700 schrieb Sean Whitton:
>
> We don't remove files for the sole reason that they're intended for use
> on other platforms. It's typically only done if the files are huge. So
> please remove this one from the list.
>
> How about just saying: we always r
On 1/27/22 5:11 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
Hello David,
...
Reviewing this bug, it is still not clear to me that a virtual package
is wanted as opposed to just making /usr/bin/todo a path managed by the
alternatives system.
I'm closing the bug, but if development that has taken place in the
to
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 02:52:18PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Joe,
> > +
> > +These types of files, or any others that Debian does not want to
> > +include in our archive, must be stripped from the upstream tarball
> > +prior to uploading. The Files-Excluded fi
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:11:51 -0700
with message-id <87wnik96c8@melete.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#976402: Proposed official virtual packages - todo and
todo.txt
has caused the Debian Bug report #976402,
regarding Proposed official virtual packages - todo and todo.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to 'source':'debian-policy'
> tags 999566 + pending
Bug #999566 [src:debian-policy] debian-policy: highlight source cod
Hello Joe,
Thanks for the patch. Here's a review:
On Sat 13 Nov 2021 at 11:21PM -05, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> +
> + Pre-compiled executable binary or other non human-editable
> files;
> +
The reason we remove these is also DFSG.
> +
> +
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
