Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:33:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#973491: fixed in debian-policy 4.5.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #973491,
regarding debian-policy: ch-opersys refers to wrong manpage section for
systemd.unit
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:05:43 -0700
Source: debian-policy
Architecture: source
Version: 4.5.1.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors
Changed-By: Sean Whitton
Closes: 955005 959909 9710
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:33:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#974911: fixed in debian-policy 4.5.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #974911,
regarding debian-policy: Date in documentation varies with timezone
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:33:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971023: fixed in debian-policy 4.5.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #971023,
regarding Version field (5.6.12) and colons
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:33:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955005: fixed in debian-policy 4.5.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #955005,
regarding Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:33:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959909: fixed in debian-policy 4.5.1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #959909,
regarding debian-policy: complete implementation of ctte decision to forbid
vendor-specific series files
to be marked as done.
debian-policy_4.5.1.0_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-policy_4.5.1.0.dsc
debian-policy_4.5.1.0.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Hi,
Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Mon 16 Nov 2020 at 04:12AM +01, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 13:30:13 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>> Could I ask you to explain your wanting to reduce the Essential set for
>>> the sake of small installation size in more detail, including some
>>> nu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to 'source':'debian-policy'
> tags 974911 + pending
Bug #974911 [debian-policy] debian-policy: Date in documentation va
Hello,
On Mon 16 Nov 2020 at 04:12AM +01, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 13:30:13 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Could I ask you to explain your wanting to reduce the Essential set for
>> the sake of small installation size in more detail, including some
>> numbers, please? It would
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:02:54AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> While a consistent time was returned, depending on the timezone
> the package was built in can cause the date to vary:
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> -DATE := $(shell date -d '@$(TIMESTAMP)' +'%Y-%m-%d')
> +DATE :=
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.0.3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timezone
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
While the Makefile gets a consistent timestamp from debian/changelog,
the date may vary depending on tim
12 matches
Mail list logo
