Hi cate,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 04:10:00PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> The rationale was probably similar so symlinks: they may fail across
> different filesystems, and we supported to have e.g. / /usr /usr/share
> /usr/local /var (and various /var/*) /home /tmp /boot etc on different file
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:05:43PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> > > Now we are more strict on where we can split filesystems
> > What do you mean?
>
> If I remember correctly, now we do not support / and /usr to be on a
> different filesystems
Not really, please read
https://freedesktop.org/w
On 12.10.2020 16:22, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 04:10:00PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Now we are more strict on where we can split filesystems
What do you mean?
If I remember correctly, now we do not support / and /usr to be on a
different filesystems, and I think
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 04:10:00PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Now we are more strict on where we can split filesystems
What do you mean?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 13.09.2020 12:52, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.0.3
Severity: wishlist
Jakub stumbled into the "No hard links in source packages" requirement
added around 1996 and couldn't make sense of it. Neither could Christoph
nor myself. tar does support hard links just fine.
Hi Guillem,
thanks for your prompt concurrence with both, #971977 and #971975.
One nitpick:
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Right. I've clarified this now locally for deb-changelog(5) as follows:
> +Is a one- or two-digit day of the month (B<01>-B<31>), where the heading
6 matches
Mail list logo
