Hello,
On Wed 07 Oct 2020 at 06:43pm -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Josh, my current reading is that there is not support for even the
> first step. I believe Guillem and I have disagreed, and I haven't
> noticed support from anyone other than you.
Speaking as Policy Editor, I agree. I don't see an
> "Josh" == Josh Triplett writes:
Josh> Long-term, I'd like to see that happen. But I'm a huge fan of
Josh> incremental steps; defining the problem as "eliminate
Josh> Essential" makes it both difficult enough and controversial
Josh> enough to make it unlikely to happen at all
2 matches
Mail list logo
