Florian Weimer writes:
> But until these versions are explicitly described as invalid, shouldn't
> the comparison algorithm cover them, so that different implementations
> behave in the same way?
Oh, definitely. And I believe the textual description does cover them;
there just aren't any exampl
* Russ Allbery:
> Samuel Henrique writes:
>
>> I suggest making it more explicit by adding an example to it and
>> explicitly writing the precedence of them, I did some tests with dpkg
>> --compare-versions to confirm and found out that that is (n being a
>> number):
>> "~ - n + ." eg.: 1.0~0-1
2 matches
Mail list logo
