On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:44:10AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 at 21:54:40 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > This is a fair comment. The wording was potentially misleading. How about
> > the attached instead?
>
> This mostly looks good, just one thing that I would add:
>
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 at 21:54:40 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> This is a fair comment. The wording was potentially misleading. How about
> the attached instead?
This mostly looks good, just one thing that I would add:
> -If a relationship field has a version number attached, only real
> -pack
2 matches
Mail list logo
