Hi!
On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 00:37:33 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Maybe, but this is neither a new miscellaneous file nor a new
> bootstrapping action. This is yet another bootstrapping tool
> forgetting the lessons learned from the other bootstrapping tools.
My impression though is that the gener
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:37:46AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 10:21:30 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The reason I'm often asked to add hacks to base-files.postinst is only
> > that base-files is usually configured in the second place
>
> I think it's also fair to say t
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 07:50:27AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > I would certainly consider a lot cleaner to add a new field to base-files in
> > the form "Bootstrap-Depends: base-passwd" than converting all chowns in
> > postinst to use integer numbers.
>
> I agree that we should not expect
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 10:21:30 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The reason I'm often asked to add hacks to base-files.postinst is only
> that base-files is usually configured in the second place
I think it's also fair to say that base-files is exactly a collection of
the miscellaneous files and boot
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 07:50:27AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> I agree that we should not expect maintainers to write numeric user and group
> ids into their maintainer scripts. This is not only hard to write but also
> hard
> to read and maintain. In my opinion, using numeric ids should onl
5 matches
Mail list logo
