Hi,
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 12:29:50PM +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> I hereby propose to drop section 1.6 Translations and the following
>> sentence: "When translations of this document into languages other
>> than English disagree with the English text, the English text t
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 12:29:50PM +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I hereby propose to drop section 1.6 Translations and the following
> sentence: "When translations of this document into languages other
> than English disagree with the English text, the English text takes
> precedence."
>
> If i
Hello Ansgar,
On Wed 02 Jan 2019 at 06:08pm +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I see the review process more as generally agreeing on the change; not
> every problem will be caught anyway.
We tend to spend about as much time on wordsmithing to avoid
misinterpretations, as discussing what the chang
Hello Dominic,
Thank you for coming back to this.
On Tue 01 Jan 2019 at 06:41pm GMT, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> -If a relationship field has a version number attached, only real
> -packages will be considered to see whether the relationship is satisfied
> -(or the prohibition violated, for a co
Sean Whitton writes:
> On Wed 02 Jan 2019 at 12:29pm +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> I hereby propose to drop section 1.6 Translations and the following
>> sentence: "When translations of this document into languages other
>> than English disagree with the English text, the English text takes
>>
5 matches
Mail list logo
