Hello,
On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for
>epoch bump [and 2 more messages]"):
>> On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > When we get to tidying this up, the epoch-ignoring new file name
>> > uniqueness section coul
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 dia
Bug #900060 [debian-policy] apt-get build-dep debian-policy installs too much
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-policy' to 'dia'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-policy/4.1.4.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #900060 to
control: reassign -1 dia
control: severity -1 wishlist
control: retitle -1 Provide binary package containing CLI dia, without GUI
dependencies
Hello,
On Fri, May 25 2018, Russ Allbery wrote:
> dia is at fault for all of this, which is in Build-Depends to allow
> the maintainer script state diag
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch
bump [and 2 more messages]"):
> On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > When we get to tidying this up, the epoch-ignoring new file name
> > uniqueness section could probably do with a cross-reference.
>
> Do you mean
Hello,
On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> When we get to tidying this up, the epoch-ignoring new file name
> uniqueness section could probably do with a cross-reference.
Do you mean 3.2.2?
> I did decide to make the text discouraging epochs a subsection.
This is good. I'm also glad you
Sean Whitton writes:
> On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> (There was also an *enormous* pile of fonts and document processing
>> tools etc., which is expected, I guess, although I do wonder what
>> proportion of all that is used.)
> Once we finish converting documents other than the main
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Bug#900060: apt-get build-dep debian-policy installs
too much"):
> Yeah, it's a GUI program we're running in batch mode. In an ideal world,
> there would be some separate library and CLI tool that would do batch
> conversions that would be kept separate from all the GUI
Ian Jackson writes:
> I'm afraid to ask, but: why does python-gtk2 depend on numpy ? Don't
> get me wrong, I like numpy, but, err, needed for gtk ?
> Also, does dia really need python-gtk2 for the invocations we are
> using ? Or, indeed for most of its invocations ? ... looks at the
> manpage
Hello,
On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (There was also an *enormous* pile of fonts and document processing
> tools etc., which is expected, I guess, although I do wonder what
> proportion of all that is used.)
Once we finish converting documents other than the main Policy manual to
rst
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Bug#900060: apt-get build-dep debian-policy installs
too much"):
> It depends on python-gtk2, which in turn depends on python-numpy. It also
> depends on libgtk2.0-0, which depends on libcups2, which pulls in
> libavahi-common3. libgtk2.0-0 depends on both gnome-icon-th
Ian Jackson writes:
> I did this, with recommends enabled, in a bare-ish sid shroot, and it
> installed
>python-numpy(wtf!)
>libavahi-common3(libavahi:amd64 is sadly to be expected)
>python-gtk2 (for gui applications?)
>hicolor-icon-theme gnome-icon
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump
[and 2 more messages]"):
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Please find attached a diff against current
> master.
The attachment seems to have got lost. Sorry, here it is.
Ian.
diff --git a/p
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:18:10PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.1.4.1
> Severity: minor
>
> I did this, with recommends enabled, in a bare-ish sid shroot, and it
> installed
>python-numpy(wtf!)
>libavahi-common3(libavahi:amd64 is sadly
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #891216 [debian-policy] Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump
Added tag(s) patch.
--
891216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891216
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + patch
Thanks for the feedback. Please find attached a diff against current
master.
Mattia Rizzolo writes ("Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch
bump"):
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:26:01PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > + Epochs should not usually be used when
>
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.1.4.1
Severity: minor
I did this, with recommends enabled, in a bare-ish sid shroot, and it
installed
python-numpy(wtf!)
libavahi-common3(libavahi:amd64 is sadly to be expected)
python-gtk2 (for gui applications?)
hicolo
16 matches
Mail list logo
