Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
OK, I get it. So just like saying Depends: x, x or Depends: x Depends: x twice is so ridiculous that it doesn't need to be explicitly mentioned as bad.

Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Sean Whitton writes: > Could you explain why you think this is needed, please? What problems > could be caused by a package being listed in more than one field, and > what problems could be caused by forbidding that? Particularly since this won't even appear in the binary package because dpkg-g

Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:21:47AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > BA> As I see it, it is not a bug, but a quality of implementation issue > BA> that could be flagged by lintian, but does not need to appear in policy. > > BA> Most of the time it will be an oversight or caused by a change in > BA>

Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:54:02AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > SW> Could you explain why you think this is needed, please? What problems > SW> could be caused by a package being listed in more than one field, and > SW> what problems could be caused by forbidding that? > > Please have your po

Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
BA> As I see it, it is not a bug, but a quality of implementation issue BA> that could be flagged by lintian, but does not need to appear in policy. BA> Most of the time it will be an oversight or caused by a change in BA> external dependencies, so it is worthwhile to notify the maintainer, BA> bu

Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
SW> Could you explain why you think this is needed, please? What problems SW> could be caused by a package being listed in more than one field, and SW> what problems could be caused by forbidding that? Please have your policy say if it is OK to drive on the right side of the road or the left side

Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello Dan, On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:05:08AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > On > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps > please add an explicit statement: > > A package listed in Depends must not also be listed in Suggests or > R

Processed: Re: Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests

2018-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 +moreinfo Bug #809383 [debian-policy] mention explicitly double listing: Depends, Recommends, Suggests Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 809383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809383 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p