Bug#881633: Creation of vim-python3 virtual package

2017-11-13 Thread Víctor Cuadrado Juan
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:34:44 +0100 Víctor Cuadrado Juan wrot> It will allow vim python3 plugins to require on it. Expanding on the rationale: vim works with python2 and python3 plugins simultaneously. Those vim python plugins depend on the vim-python virtual package. In the case of neovim, sup

Processed: Re: Your mail

2017-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 872942 by 881633 881642 Bug #872942 [python-neovim] vim-python: neovim missed 872942 was not blocked by any bugs. 872942 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 872942: 881633 and 881642 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Add vim-python3 & vim-python to list of virtual packages (was: Add already existing `vim-python` virtual package to list of virtual packages)

2017-11-13 Thread Víctor Cuadrado Juan
On 13/11/17 19:34, Russ Allbery wrote: > Could you please file this as a bug? > > I'm a bit confused about the difference between vim-nox, vim, and > vim-python and what vims are available in the archive that do not satisfy > vim-python, so if you could include that information in the bug as well,

Bug#881642: Add already existing `vim-python` virtual package to list of virtual packages

2017-11-13 Thread Víctor Cuadrado Juan
Package: debian-policy Version: 4.1.1.1 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, while opening the debian-policy wishlist bug [1] about creating a vim-python3 package, I've noticed that the existing `vim-python` package is not in the list of virtual packages main

Bug#881633: Creation of vim-python3 virtual package

2017-11-13 Thread Víctor Cuadrado Juan
Package: debian-policy Version: 4.1.1.1 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Following steps in [1], here is the wishlist bug for creating a `vim-python3` virtual package, homologous to the already present `vim-python` virtual package. It will allow vim python3 plug

Re: Add already existing `vim-python` virtual package to list of virtual packages

2017-11-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Víctor Cuadrado Juan writes: > I've noticed that the existing `vim-python` package is not in the list of > virtual packages maintained at [1]. > Please, consider adding it to the list. I propose the following description: > Miscellaneous > - > vim-python a compatible v