Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive

2017-08-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Ansgar, On Mon, Aug 28 2017, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: >> +This field should not be used for purposes other than satisfying >> +license requirements to provide full source code. > > The DFSG requires source code to be provided too... Can you suggest a better word than

Processed: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, tagging 870915 ...

2017-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was spwhit...@spwhitton.name). > limit package debian-policy Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy' Limit currentl

Re: debian/upstream/signing-key.asc in policy 4.1.0

2017-08-28 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 08:51:49PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Note that this Policy language is carefully written to make it perfectly > > fine for uscan to support all the things it currently supports, since it > > only talks about

Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive

2017-08-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Sean Whitton writes: > +This field should not be used for purposes other than satisfying > +license requirements to provide full source code. The DFSG requires source code to be provided too... Ansgar