Chris Lamb writes:
> Hi Bill,
>> How do you define "moderated" ?
> I can't really, sorry. I guess getting a "Your message awaits moderator
> approval" quasi-bounce… but that's not exactly right.
My personal feeling is that the current vagueness is a feature rather than
a bug. I think a moder
Hi Bill,
> How do you define "moderated" ?
I can't really, sorry. I guess getting a "Your message awaits moderator
approval" quasi-bounce… but that's not exactly right.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Hi Bill,
> How do you define "moderated" ?
I can't really, sorry. I guess getting a "Your message awaits moderator
approval" quasi-bounce… but that's not exactly right.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:58:15PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.0.1.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> Please clarify whether mailing lists in Maintainers/Uploaders may
> point to moderated mailing lists.
>
> Having such a list in the Maintainer field, even in t
Your message dated Tue, 08 Aug 2017 14:30:34 -0700
with message-id <8760dx3fyd@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line done
has caused the Debian Bug report #484656,
regarding main menu for top three desktops for debian not covered by policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 08 Aug 2017 14:29:00 -0700
with message-id <878tit3g0z@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line done
has caused the Debian Bug report #477990,
regarding Remove non-conflicting requirement in optional; relax dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.0.1.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please clarify whether mailing lists in Maintainers/Uploaders may
point to moderated mailing lists.
Having such a list in the Maintainer field, even in the cases where
they are actively and regularly monitored, appears to violate the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 795402 859649
Bug #795402 [debian-policy] base-files: Please add Creative Commons license
texts
Bug #859649 [debian-policy] debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses
Merged 795402 859649
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 823766 Define *-browser virtual packages
Bug #823766 [debian-policy] firefox: alternative for
/usr/share/applications/x-www-browser.desktop
Changed Bug title to 'Define *-browser virtual packages' from 'firefox:
alternative for /usr/shar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 786470 737796
Bug #786470 [debian-policy] debian-policy: [copyright-format] Add an optional
“License-Grant” field
Bug #737796 [debian-policy] copyright-format: support Files: paragraph with
both abbreviated names and license paragraph
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 122038 Add FHS exception for Debian's use of /var/backups
Bug #122038 [debian-policy] Use of /var/backups is apparently undocumented
Changed Bug title to 'Add FHS exception for Debian's use of /var/backups' from
'Use of /var/backups is ap
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 850157 728200
Bug #850157 [debian-policy] Please deprecate all ad-hoc patch systems
Bug #728200 [debian-policy] Clarify requirements for how to put a source
package in a modifiable state
Severity set to 'normal' from 'minor'
Marked as
Source: python3-defaults
Version: 3.5.3-3
Severity: important
As reported in https://bugs.debian.org/870820 and getting very positive
feedback at DEBCONF17 after migrating Debian Policy to DocBookXML,
debiandoc-sgml will be removed from the archive at buster+{0,1}. I am sending
reminder to package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes:
>> diff --git a/policy.xml b/policy.xml
>> index 6086901..c14d9b4 100644
>> --- a/policy.xml
>> +++ b/policy.xml
>> @@ -2556,11 +2556,28 @@ endif
>>
>>
>> This is an optional, recommended configuration file for the
>> -uscan utility which def
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
...
> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 20:26:41 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> > Also, where signature files are desired, I think it would be beneficial to
> > also accept binary ".sig" files as an alternative to ".asc" files, for
> > example as
Hi!
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 20:26:41 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> Also, where signature files are desired, I think it would be beneficial to
> also accept binary ".sig" files as an alternative to ".asc" files, for
> example as produced with "gpg -b".
There is no need for that, you can convert from AS
17 matches
Mail list logo
