Le Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:43:25PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> Package: developers-reference
> Version: 3.4.15
>
> §A.8.5 mentions the debview package, but this package was removed from the
> archive in 2003. The debview code has been integrated into the debian-el
> package.
>
> Reference: bug
Le Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:42:39PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> Package: developers-reference
> Version: 3.4.15
>
> §A.8.4 mentions the debian-maintainers package, but this package was removed
> from the archive in 2010.
Hi all,
how about the following, or a simpler version where the debian-mai
Le Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:42:26PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> Package: developers-reference
> Version: 3.4.15
>
> §A.7.1 mentions the quinn-diff package, but this package was removed from
> the archive in 2011.
>
> Reference: bug #618820
Hi Jakub and everybody,
I think that the mention of qu
Le Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:38:15PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
>
> A footnote in §11.6 reads:
>
> “You will need to depend on `liblockfile1 (>>1.01)' to use these [maillock
> and mailunlock] functions.”
>
> This seems to suggest hardcoding shared library dependency in debian/control,
> which is
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
A footnote in §11.6 reads:
“You will need to depend on `liblockfile1 (>>1.01)' to use these
[maillock and mailunlock] functions.”
This seems to suggest hardcoding shared library dependency in debian/control,
which is a bad idea. Anyway, liblockfile 1.01
5 matches
Mail list logo
