reopen 766711
block 766711 by 767839
thanks
>
> I have taken the liberty of marking the bug as wontfix (read: "cantfix")
> and closing it.
I'm re-opening it, as neither the bug has not been fixed, nor the Policy
has been changed to explicitly disallow linking arch:any to arch:all
(see #767839).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 766711
Bug #766711 {Done: Niels Thykier } [debhelper] debhelper:
Dependency added by dh_installdocs --link-doc breaks binary-only NMUs
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #766711 to the same values
previously set
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 03:06:47PM -0400, Jetro Costa wrote:
> The package debian-policy is utdated according to
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/policy.pdf
> , this is updated in the 2014 year, and the package still in year 2012.
The package in jessie and sid is from 2014, the package i
The package debian-policy is utdated according to
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/policy.pdf
, this is updated in the 2014 year, and the package still in year 2012.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Hi!
The context is that Andrey wanted to get, in a maintscript, the
new version of the package during upgrade, to be able to abort on
downgrades, w/o needing to use a template maintscript to replace
the current version at build-time, which is inconvenient.
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:55:36 +0200, An
Hi,
> > | awk '{total = total + int($1/4096) + 4096}END{print total}'
>
I don't understand this line. Counting file blocks works like this:
> > | awk '{total = total + int(($1+4095)/4096)}END{print total}'
except that we don't know what the destination block size is, so I wouldn't
bothe
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.12
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
as part of my NM process I was asked how to upload to
stable/stable-proposed-updates. I noticed that the dev ref does not say
explicitly how to do such uploads and whether or not there is a
difference between functionality bug f
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.12
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I think the developers reference could use a unified section of all
conventions around Debian versions.
I will split this email into three subsections which I think make sense
for the new section I propose.
I was also told in
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.12
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
section 6.5.2.6. is titled "be gender neutral" and also explicitly
advises to "use gender-neutral constructions in your writing" but in the
same line says "The world is made of men and women". This is not being
gender
9 matches
Mail list logo
