Re: Bug#769273: bsdutils: Dependency on libsystemd0 violates policy

2014-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Tim Wootton writes: > or just build without the dependency in the 1st place like it used to > be. After all it's not like it adds anything that's essential. No, including the dependency is the right approach and is consistent with how Debian has always handled issues like this. We always enable

Bug#769219: function moved

2014-11-12 Thread Rob Browning
Bill Allombert writes: > What to do for ascii : > > emacs24 --batch -Q -l ./README-css.el -l org -l org-ascii > --visit Process.org --funcall org-export-as-ascii > > Cannot open load file: No such file or directory, org-ascii Perhaps that's now org-ascii-export-as-ascii? $ dpkg --listfiles em

Bug#769219: function moved

2014-11-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:46:28PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: > Bill Allombert writes: > >> That function is now in ox-html.el > > > > Are you sure ? > > grep org-export-as-html-batch > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-mode/ox-html.el > > does not return anything. > > Sorry, I was misled by em

Bug#769219: function moved

2014-11-12 Thread David Bremner
Bill Allombert writes: >> That function is now in ox-html.el > > Are you sure ? > grep org-export-as-html-batch /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-mode/ox-html.el > does not return anything. Sorry, I was misled by emacs function name completion. The following is a partial solution. There is still s

Bug#769219: function moved

2014-11-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 07:40:14PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: Hello David, Thanks for your help! > That function is now in ox-html.el Are you sure ? grep org-export-as-html-batch /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-mode/ox-html.el does not return anything. > Maybe loading that explicitly (as well

Processed: 769273 is a duplicate of 758234

2014-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 769273 debian-policy Bug #769273 [bsdutils] bsdutils: Dependency on libsystemd0 violates policy Bug reassigned from package 'bsdutils' to 'debian-policy'. No longer marked as found in versions util-linux/2.25.2-2. Ignoring request to alte

769273 is a duplicate of 758234

2014-11-12 Thread Andreas Henriksson
reassign 769273 debian-policy forcemerge 758234 769273 affects 758234 bsdutils thanks Merging one instance of the bug with the more general bug report. Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Bug#769219: function moved

2014-11-12 Thread David Bremner
That function is now in ox-html.el Maybe loading that explicitly (as well as org?) helps. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87a93wntyp@maritor

Re: Bug#769273: bsdutils: Dependency on libsystemd0 violates policy

2014-11-12 Thread Tim Wootton
On 12/11/14 14:29, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 12.11.2014 um 15:04 schrieb Andreas Henriksson: Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.! Thanks for your bug report. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote: Package: bsdutils Version: 1:2.25.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: P

Re: Bug#769273: bsdutils: Dependency on libsystemd0 violates policy

2014-11-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.11.2014 um 15:35 schrieb Bill Allombert: > It is well settled that priority changes are done throught the distribution > override file and not in the package control file and thus, an error of > priority is not a RC bug in the package. And that. Adjusting library package priorities is useles

Re: Bug#769273: bsdutils: Dependency on libsystemd0 violates policy

2014-11-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.11.2014 um 15:04 schrieb Andreas Henriksson: > Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.! > > Thanks for your bug report. > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote: >> Package: bsdutils >> Version: 1:2.25.2-2 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: Policy 2.5 >> >> Dear M

Re: Bug#769273: bsdutils: Dependency on libsystemd0 violates policy

2014-11-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.! > > Thanks for your bug report. > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote: > > Package: bsdutils > > Version: 1:2.25.2-2 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Po

Re: Bug#769273: bsdutils: Dependency on libsystemd0 violates policy

2014-11-12 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.! Thanks for your bug report. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote: > Package: bsdutils > Version: 1:2.25.2-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.5 > > Dear Maintainer, > > libsystemd0 dependancy violates constraint at the

Bug#769219: debian-policy: FTBFS in jessie: emacs24 fails

2014-11-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 08:52:21AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a > sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64. > > Relevant part (hopefully): > > rm menu-policy.html/index.html perl-policy.html/index.html > >

Bug#769219: debian-policy: FTBFS in jessie: emacs24 fails

2014-11-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: debian-policy Version: 3.9.6.0 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a sid chroot), your package failed to b