Bug#683643: marked as done (dev-ref as .epub or .mobi)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:33:06 +0200 with message-id <20140731063306.ga28...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: dev-ref as .epub or .mobi has caused the Debian Bug report #683643, regarding dev-ref as .epub or .mobi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

developers-reference_3.4.13_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:52:15 +0200 Source: developers-reference Binary: developers-reference developers-reference-de developers-reference-fr developers-reference-ja Architecture: source all Version: 3.4.13 Distribution: u

Bug#755515: marked as done (developers-reference: A bit strange wording in the NMU section)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#755515: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #755515, regarding developers-reference: A bit strange wording in the NMU section to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#719888: marked as done (developers-reference: Says next stable release will be called wheezy)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#719888: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #719888, regarding developers-reference: Says next stable release will be called wheezy to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#736381: marked as done (developers-reference: add Steam subscriptions to the list of goodies offered to Debian Developers)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#736381: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #736381, regarding developers-reference: add Steam subscriptions to the list of goodies offered to Debian Developers to be marked a

Bug#756491: marked as done (developers-reference: Vcs-git field: typo anonscn instead of anonscm)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#756491: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #756491, regarding developers-reference: Vcs-git field: typo anonscn instead of anonscm to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#741269: marked as done (tools: use GIT instead of CVS, Use cowbuilder instead od pbuilder-uml)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#741269: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #741269, regarding tools: use GIT instead of CVS, Use cowbuilder instead od pbuilder-uml to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#672198: marked as done ([developers-reference] NMU clarification for section 5.11.1)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672198: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #672198, regarding [developers-reference] NMU clarification for section 5.11.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#581603: marked as done (developers-reference: please mention that DMs can now get HP-sponsored LWN subscriptions)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#581603: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #581603, regarding developers-reference: please mention that DMs can now get HP-sponsored LWN subscriptions to be marked as done.

Bug#708665: marked as done (devref: 'GNU/Linux' should be dropped on most places.)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#708665: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #708665, regarding devref: 'GNU/Linux' should be dropped on most places. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#671705: marked as done (Sect 4.8: add reference to debian-experimental-changes)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:33:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#671705: fixed in developers-reference 3.4.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #671705, regarding Sect 4.8: add reference to debian-experimental-changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processing of developers-reference_3.4.13_amd64.changes

developers-reference_3.4.13_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: developers-reference_3.4.13_all.deb developers-reference-de_3.4.13_all.deb developers-reference-fr_3.4.13_all.deb developers-reference-ja_3.4.13_all.deb developers-reference_3.4.13.dsc dev

Bug#736381: developers-reference: add Steam subscriptions to the list of goodies offered to Debian Developers

Hi, On 26/02/14 at 10:49 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Please remember to CC bug submitters when relevant since they are > usually not subscribed and I am definitely not. > > I can see both sides of this but I don't really mind which patch gets > into devref, so, please choose a patch, add "Debian Ma

Processed: Re: Bug#732445: debian-policy should encourage verification of upstream cryptographic signaturse

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 742552 - patch Bug #742552 [developers-reference] developers-reference should encourage verification of upstream cryptographic signatures Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: limit source to developers-reference, tagging 672198, tagging 756491, tagging 581603

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source developers-reference Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'developers-reference' Limit currently set to 'source':'developers-reference' > tags 672198 + pending Bug #672198 [developers-reference] [developer

Bug#756491: developers-reference: Vcs-git field: typo anonscn instead of anonscm

On 30/07/14 at 09:37 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > - - documenting in the previous Subversion repository that it moved (and > remove it to avoid contributions there). Done. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Processed: limit source to developers-reference, tagging 756491, tagging 581603

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source developers-reference Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'developers-reference' Limit currently set to 'source':'developers-reference' > tags 756491 + pending Bug #756491 [developers-reference] developers

Processed: limit source to developers-reference, tagging 671705, tagging 741269, tagging 719888, tagging 736381 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source developers-reference Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'developers-reference' Limit currently set to 'source':'developers-reference' > tags 671705 + pending Bug #671705 [developers-reference] Sect 4.8:

Processed: limit source to developers-reference, tagging 581603, tagging 672198, tagging 736381, tagging 756491

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source developers-reference Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'developers-reference' Limit currently set to 'source':'developers-reference' > tags 581603 + pending Bug #581603 [developers-reference] developers

Bug#680174: Improving our response to "duplicate" packages in Debian

tags 680174 - patch thanks On 10/07/12 at 17:50 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:40:40AM +0200, Guus Sliepen a écrit : > > > > Attached is a patch against the developers-reference source. It can > > probably be improved, any comments are welcome. > > Dear Guus, > > than

[developers-reference] annotated tag debian/3.4.13 created (now 49b4d19)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lucas pushed a change to annotated tag debian/3.4.13 in repository developers-reference. at 49b4d19 (tag) tagging 16c13ad02ef6857596b41ea2af2f719541cb9421 (commit) replaces debian/3.4.12 tagged by Lucas Nussbau

Bug#732445: debian-policy should encourage verification of upstream cryptographic signaturse

tags 742552 - patch thanks Hi, On 24/03/14 at 19:08 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Maybe at this stage, the recommendation would be better placed in > > developers-reference. > > thanks, that's a good idea. > > i've cloned the bug to suggest its inclusion in developers-reference, > where

Processed: limit source to developers-reference, tagging 756491

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source developers-reference Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'developers-reference' Limit currently set to 'source':'developers-reference' > tags 756491 + pending Bug #756491 [developers-reference] developers

Processed: Re: Bug#680174: Improving our response to "duplicate" packages in Debian

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 680174 - patch Bug #680174 [developers-reference] Improving our response to "duplicate" packages in Debian Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 680174: http://bugs.debian.org

Processed: tagging 657107

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 657107 - patch Bug #657107 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference : styles of handwriting are Bold Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657107: http://bugs.debian.or

[developers-reference] 02/11: Update changelog. Add bugnumber for previous change.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lucas pushed a commit to branch master in repository developers-reference. commit 34cc15e683169e91dce01e84f42d74438f67babc Author: Lucas Nussbaum Date: Wed Jul 30 17:18:59 2014 +0200 Update changelog. Add bugnumber for pre

[developers-reference] 01/11: Fix typo in Vcs-Git:. Closes: #756491

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lucas pushed a commit to branch master in repository developers-reference. commit d61cbdcbf867dc621fdc56c9d22675fc157e38fe Author: Lucas Nussbaum Date: Wed Jul 30 17:11:29 2014 +0200 Fix typo in Vcs-Git:. Closes: #756491 -

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:31:33AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow writes ("Re: Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not > documented/defined"): > > It is a bug in Debian: The multiarch tuples are not documented/defined > > in Debian. > > They are now documented on the wiki, as previ

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:31:13PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:41:01AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Hi Russ et al, > > First, thanks Jonathan a lot for providing this patch. While this is > not the full story this gives us a better basis to document multiarch. >

small editorial fix (multiarch)

Dear policy team, For your information, I have pushed the following fix: commit 94af6993b04df63bb2b677b1a8b0d6efcb848549 Author: Bill Allombert Date: Wed Jul 30 15:28:56 2014 +0200 policy.sgml 9.1.1: Remove 'the planned development of' before multiarch diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.s

Bug#756491: developers-reference: Vcs-git field: typo anonscn instead of anonscm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 30/07/2014 06:11, Fabien Givors a écrit : > I recenctly tried to debcheckout developers-reference, it failed and noticed a > typo in the Vcs-GIT field. It looks like the migration was made in a hurry without considering: - - at least inform

Bug#593611: Clarify whose signature should go in debian/changelog (4.4)

On 30 July 2014 14:08, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:46:18AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> > Bill Allombert writes: >> > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:10:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> > >> > >> --- a/polic

Bug#593611: Clarify whose signature should go in debian/changelog (4.4)

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:46:18AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Bill Allombert writes: > > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:10:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > > >> --- a/policy.sgml > > >> +++ b/policy.sgml > > >> @@ -1688,11 +

Processed: limit source to debian-policy, tagging 588497

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #debian-policy (3.9.6.0) unstable; urgency=low > # > # * virtual-package-names-list: Add httpd-wsgi > #Wording: Bill Allombert > #Seconded: Jonas Smedegaard > #Seconded: Piotr Ożarowski > #Closes: #588497 > # > limit source deb

Bug#588497: New virtual package: httpd-wsgi

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:28:37PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Bill Allombert, 2014-07-30] > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > Would that description be OK: > > > > > > > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server

Bug#719888: developers-reference: Says next stable release will be called wheezy

Hi, I updated the patch (for commit ce9016122bb6c67aa8407ec2e0b27ee40137819c) so it doesn't change the phrasing but fixes the bug. This way is more consistent with what propose bug: which I think makes sense. Thanks, -- fabien diff --g

Bug#588497: New virtual package: httpd-wsgi

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:19:29PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Bill Allombert (2014-07-30 11:59:38) > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Bill Allombert wrote: > >>> Would that description be OK: > >>> > >>> httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable H

Bug#588497: New virtual package: httpd-wsgi

[Bill Allombert, 2014-07-30] > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Would that description be OK: > > > > > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server > > > > > > Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to

Bug#588497: New virtual package: httpd-wsgi

Quoting Bill Allombert (2014-07-30 11:59:38) > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Bill Allombert wrote: >>> Would that description be OK: >>> >>> httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server >>> >>> Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related package

Bug#756491: developers-reference: Vcs-git field: typo anonscn instead of anonscm

Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.12 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, I recenctly tried to debcheckout developers-reference, it failed and noticed a typo in the Vcs-GIT field. It's written anonscN instead of anonscM. Thanks, -- fabien -- System Information: Debian Rele

Bug#588497: New virtual package: httpd-wsgi

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote: > > Would that description be OK: > > > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server > > > > Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to second > > this ? > > I second the above