Your message dated Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:26:28 -0400
with message-id <20140703172628.ga16...@helios.pault.ag>
and subject line Re: Bug#753608: Clarify use of conflicts, clarify what
constitutes abuse of the relation
has caused the Debian Bug report #753608,
regarding Clarify use of conflicts, clarify
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 07:24:51PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:52:23AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > I don't see a systemd-must-die package (conflicting with a core part of
> > the Distro) as being productive, helpful or necessary. I definitely
> > don't see it as
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:52:23AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> I don't see a systemd-must-die package (conflicting with a core part of
> the Distro) as being productive, helpful or necessary. I definitely
> don't see it as there for the right reason.
This is not for policy to decide that.
>
Paul Tagliamonte writes:
> I'd like to clarify the purpose of the Conflicts relation, as written in
> section 7.2 and 7.4.
> Recently a package (systemd-must-die) was uploaded to NEW. This package
> creates a Conflicts relation with systemd packages, and tries to prevent
> their install[1].
> I
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:52:23AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 05:27:21PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > There are precedents for such package, namely harden-servers and
> > harden-clients
> > What alternative to the use of Conflicts would you suggest ?
> I didn't k
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 05:27:21PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> There are precedents for such package, namely harden-servers and
> harden-clients
> What alternative to the use of Conflicts would you suggest ?
I didn't know about these, interesting packages. Seems fine to me, since
you'd never g
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:01:28AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: important
> thanks
>
> Hey Policy,
>
> I'd like to clarify the purpose of the Conflicts relation, as written in
> section 7.2 and 7.4.
>
> Recently a package (systemd-must-die) was uploaded to
Package: debian-policy
Severity: important
thanks
Hey Policy,
I'd like to clarify the purpose of the Conflicts relation, as written in
section 7.2 and 7.4.
Recently a package (systemd-must-die) was uploaded to NEW. This package
creates a Conflicts relation with systemd packages, and tries to pre
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> An easy improvement is to switch to Git and collab-maint, and to
> announce that direct commits of consensual changes are OK.
> After that, we could call for help.
> Raphael, Marc, are you fine with that?
Yes.
Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> An easy improvement is to switch to Git and collab-maint, and to
> announce that direct commits of consensual changes are OK.
> After that, we could call for help.
> Raphael, Marc, are you fine with that?
Yes.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian
TL;DR: skip to last paragraph
Hi,
Paul, thanks a lot for summarizing the discussion.
On 19/06/14 at 09:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Switch to a different documentation format that more people are able to
> > write, this probably too much work to be useful though.
>
> I don't think this
11 matches
Mail list logo
