On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Debian menu is supported by much more window managers than the XDG menu draft.
This issue is addressed by the xdg-menu system from Arch Linux.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xdg-menu
For the awesome window manager there is also a s
Please remember to CC bug submitters when relevant since they are
usually not subscribed and I am definitely not.
I can see both sides of this but I don't really mind which patch gets
into devref, so, please choose a patch, add "Debian Maintainers" to it
(since they were added after the announceme
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 581603 + patch
Bug #581603 [developers-reference] developers-reference: please mention that
DMs can now get HP-sponsored LWN subscriptions
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 23:40:14 Bill Allombert wrote:
[snip]
> I do not believe Debian should favor desktop environment over lightweight
> window managers, especially since Debian users are more likely than other
> to favor use lightweight environments.
If you are going to do that statement,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:32:32AM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> >> 1. Cgi-bin executable files are installed in the directory
> >> /usr/lib/cgi-bin/ or a subdirectory of that directory, so that, typically
> >>
> >> /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name
> >>
> >> should be referr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 707851 - pending
Bug #707851 [debian-policy] debian-policy: soften the wording recommending menu
files
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
707851: http://bugs.debian.org/c
tags 707851 - pending
thanks
After reviewing the buglog, I found there are a number of objection
raised by various developers that have not been addressed.
This is a list of MSGID which have not received proper consideration:
<20130512130335.ga4...@client.brlink.eu>
<20130512100730.GA10956@yell
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #debian-policy (3.9.6.0) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * upgrading-checklist.sgml: remove spurious 'details in' leftover from
> #the HTML transition. Closes: #740100. Thanks Jakub Wilk.
> #
> limit source debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 02:33:20PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Furthermore, I think the idea of an application "belonging" to one system or
> the other is misplaced. The purpose of both the original menu system and
> the freedesktop standard is to give users consistent, menu-driven access to
>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 07:06:43PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: minor
>
> upgrading-checklist for version 3.5.4.0, §11.6 reads:
>
> “Any packages accessing the mail spool should access it via
> /var/mail and include a suitable Depends field; details in”
>
> Curio
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
upgrading-checklist for version 3.5.4.0, §11.6 reads:
“Any packages accessing the mail spool should access it via /var/mail
and include a suitable Depends field; details in”
Curiously enough, there's identical truncated sentence for version
3.2.0.0, §10
11 matches
Mail list logo
