On Wednesday 08 January 2014 11:31:07 Charles Plessy wrote:
[snip]
> Hi Lisandro,
>
> thanks for your answer. Input from all the parties is critical.
>
> in my point of view, the Policy has been used to bully the maintainers of
> FreeDesktop-compliant applications and desktop environments, and
Hi,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> please, I would like to decouple two issues.
>
> - Issue 1: the Debian menu is superseded in major destkotop environments, and
>the Policy should recognise that the Debian menu is not the lead mechanism
>for managing menus in Debian anymore. Unfortutately we
Le Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 01:15:16PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> Alas, now that completeness is eroding and I don't see much reason to
> recommend in policy to continue to add entries, unless we have clear
> advice about when packagers should include an entry in it and when
> they should ad
Le Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 01:15:16PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> Alas, now that completeness is eroding and I don't see much reason to
> recommend in policy to continue to add entries, unless we have clear
> advice about when packagers should include an entry in it and when
> they should ad
Charles Plessy wrote:
> On the other hand, it is the spirit of Debian to accept low-maintenance
> patches
> (in that case, menu entries) when it can help other projects even if one does
> not care for it. In that sense, if the Debian Menu has an active user base,
> it
> would be counter-product
5 matches
Mail list logo
