Le Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:17:39AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> To avoid unexpected changes, we changed this a long time ago (dpkg 1.16.1)
> when we introduced "dpkg-source --commit" to actually record the changes
> in a new patch.
>
> Maybe the whole processe should be documented as:
> 1
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Such policy change should have been proposed before --commit was
> > implemented.
> > dpkg is supposed to follow policy not the other way round.
>
> No, the policy doesn't dictate eve
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Such policy change should have been proposed before --commit was implemented.
> dpkg is supposed to follow policy not the other way round.
No, the policy doesn't dictate everything top-down. Large part of it are
built on top of existing practices that i
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:17:39AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Maybe the whole processe should be documented as:
> 1/ dpkg-source -x
> 2/ do the changes
> 3/ dpkg-source --commit
> 4/ dpkg-buildpackage
>
> > With the removal of the parenthetical, this looks good to me. Seconded.
>
> With the
4 matches
Mail list logo
