Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive

2013-09-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise writes: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: >> I paste below the current wording in the Policy 3.9.4. If you have an >> improvement to propose, that would be much appreciated ! > The wording doesn't appear confusing to me so I'm not the best person > to propose w

Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive

2013-09-23 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 09/23/2013 10:56, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: >> do you think that the attached patch would solve the problem ? > > There are more reasons for using Built-Using than licenses, for example: > > Rebuilding against updated versions of static libraries

Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive

2013-09-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > I paste below the current wording in the Policy 3.9.4. If you have an > improvement to propose, that would be much appreciated ! The wording doesn't appear confusing to me so I'm not the best person to propose wording changes. > The prob

Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive

2013-09-23 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > do you think that the attached patch would solve the problem ? > > There are more reasons for using Built-Using than licenses, for example: > > Rebuilding against updated

Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive

2013-09-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > do you think that the attached patch would solve the problem ? There are more reasons for using Built-Using than licenses, for example: Rebuilding against updated versions of static libraries. Rebuilding the debian-installer-*-netboot-* pa