[Dear package maintainers, you have been CCed because we are considering to
remove "mp3-decoder" from the Policy's list of virtual packages.]
Le Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 04:04:56PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
>
> I'm also for removing mp3-decoder, since I have no idea if that is
> something that jus
Le Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:41:59AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> If I end up with time to work on it, what I would probably do is to
> split the patch into smaller changes that can be considered and
> applied independently, which would hopefully be less intimidating for
> area experts to re
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:00:55AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>> does the current patch (attached) address your concerns ? If yes, would
>> you second it ?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to make one more call for feedback.
Sorry for the long silence.
My feeling is tha
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:00:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> does the current patch (attached) address your concerns ? If yes, would
> you second it ?
>
Sorry, I don't feel confident to second anything trigger-related.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:57:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> shall we go ahead and remove "mp3-encoder" from the list of virtual packages ?
Yes.
I'm also for removing mp3-decoder, since I have no idea if that is
something that just converts it to a uncompressed format, or p
Le Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:00:55AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> does the current patch (attached) address your concerns ? If yes, would
> you second it ?
Hi all,
I would like to make one more call for feedback.
Needless to say, I am annoyed that despite we had mutiple persons who commen
6 matches
Mail list logo
