Le Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:11:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:30:23PM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> >
> > I don't really see the point in that. Those sections will end up being
> > removed at some point anyway, that's why I updated the initial section
> > to po
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertags 698012 normative discussion
thanks
Le Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:00:48PM +0100, Christoph Biedl a écrit :
>
> recently I stumbled over the following paragraph in 10.6:
>
> If a package needs any special device files that are not
> included in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 701081 patch
Bug #701081 [debian-policy] debian-policy: mandate an encoding for filenames in
binary packages
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
701081: http://bugs.debian.org/
tag 701081 patch
thanks
Dear all,
I think that it emerges from the discussion that there are good uses of
Unicode, and that somebody would need to step up and ensure that a dozen of
packages are corrected if we were to restrict further the encoding of file
names. Moreover, there seems to be a go
4 matches
Mail list logo
