Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Le Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:27:37PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> We already talk about udeb in various places (shlibs, for instance). This
> isn't a new problem.
Hi Russ and everybody,
actually the only section of the Policy that currently contains
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 15:29:13 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments.
> @@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ Package: libc6
> Description
> (mandatory)
> Homepage
> Built-Using
> +id="f-Package-Type">P
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> In response to the other follow-up, I don't think this is the right
>> place (or bug) to discuss udeb package behavior or what portions of
>> Policy they comply with.
> Surely it is relevant to people reading policy that it does not comply
> with
Russ Allbery wrote:
> In response to the other follow-up, I don't think this is the right place
> (or bug) to discuss udeb package behavior or what portions of Policy they
> comply with.
Surely it is relevant to people reading policy that it does not comply with
them all (or in other words that t
Charles Plessy writes:
> here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments.
Seconded.
In response to the other follow-up, I don't think this is the right place
(or bug) to discuss udeb package behavior or what portions of Policy they
comply with.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debi
Hi,
On 8 July 2012 19:22, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> In July, 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> As demonstrated by the following trivia[1], and also mentioned by SUSv3, the
>> echo built-in varies from implementation to implementation and thus should be
>> discouraged.
[...]
>> Shells tested: 8
>> S
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
Hi,
recently I stumbled over the following paragraph in 10.6:
If a package needs any special device files that are not
included in the base system, it must call MAKEDEV in the
postinst script, after notifying the user.
and I think it needs an
7 matches
Mail list logo
