Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> --- a/copyright-format/copyright-format-1.0.xml
> +++ b/copyright-format/copyright-format-1.0.xml
> @@ -663,6 +663,14 @@ Copyright 2009, 2010 Angela Watts
> license short names for unknown Format versions.
>
>
> +For licenses which
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Peter Pentchev writes:
>
>> I am neither a DD nor a policy editor, so my opinion shouldn't be
>> treated as authoritative in any way :) Still, my feeling is that if
>> there is no short name for a license defined in the copyright format
>> s
Peter Pentchev writes:
> I am neither a DD nor a policy editor, so my opinion shouldn't be
> treated as authoritative in any way :) Still, my feeling is that if
> there is no short name for a license defined in the copyright format
> specification (the specific version of the specification that
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:43:18PM -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Policy Maintainers,
>
> I'm seeking clarification on what to use in the License field for
> licenses not specifically mentioned within the machine-readable
> debian/copyrig
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
Dear Policy Maintainers,
I'm seeking clarification on what to use in the License field for
licenses not specifically mentioned within the machine-readable
debian/copyright file spec. There seems to be no direction given in
the text. I think to would be good
5 matches
Mail list logo
