Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:27:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I do think this is iffy from a DFSG #7 perspective, since it's forcing the
>> user to agree to the additional license, but I'm not sure we've ever
>> discussed that in general.
>
> That thought crossed my mind
Le Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:08:08PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> >
> > Optional parameters:
> > revision - the revision number of the specification (digits.digits).
>
> Yup, that looks right.
> > The comment or license fields may be used to quote discussions where
> > redistribution
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:27:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>
> > To me, this feels like a specific instance of the general problem of
> > excessive maintainer script prompting.
>
> Oh, I see why you didn't class it that way: this isn't something done by
> the maintainer
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:17:05PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Josh Triplett writes:
> > I don't intend this as a slippery slope; I very specifically want to
> > cover the types of annoyances mentioned in the above paragraph, which
> > almost no software in Debian actually includes. See the tran
4 matches
Mail list logo
