Dear reviewers,
the Debian Project would like to submit the media type vnd.debian.copyright,
and in line with the draft update of RFC 4288
(draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-14), we would like to hear your comments
about our submission in preparation, that follows.
Best regards,
Charles Plessy
Charles Plessy writes:
> I was wondering about the same, but I was worried that having a
> broad-readership mailing list as a contact point would create confusion
> about who is expected to answer. How about debian-policy@lists.d.o ?
> It is anyway the contact point for the specification itself.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Still, if any of you would like to do it, please wait a bit. Let's release
> > Wheezy first.
>
> I agree that we should not upload any change along these lines to
> policy in the near future. I disagree that we
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Still, if any of you would like to do it, please wait a bit. Let's release
> Wheezy first.
I agree that we should not upload any change along these lines to
policy in the near future. I disagree that we should not find a
consensus about correct behavior and
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > * Jonathan Nieder [120911 05:45]:
> >> The requirements in policy for
> >> "debian/rules clean" are very stringent --- to avoid the
> >> "unrepresentable changes" it would be enough to _remove
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Jonathan Nieder [120911 05:45]:
>> The requirements in policy for
>> "debian/rules clean" are very stringent --- to avoid the
>> "unrepresentable changes" it would be enough to _remove_ the modified
>> (regenerated) files, but policy req
* Jonathan Nieder [120911 05:45]:
> > during the last months i had to review several packages. Quite a number
> > of packages were not buildable two times (eg. "unrepresentable changes
> > to source"). Most of these packages used svn-buildpackage or
> > cvs-buildpackage. This bug is quite annoying
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:41:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I wonder if the contact address shouldn't be something less tied to
> > project individuals, like for instance debian-project@lists.d.o. Given
> > there is already a separation between this and the author field
> > (allowing to giv
Le Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:51:24AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:10:18AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > here is the information that I consider submitting to the IANA.
>
> > Person & email address to contact for further information:
> > Charles Plessy
> […
9 matches
Mail list logo
