This one time, at band camp, Marc Haber said:
> The package itself caters only for presenter and collector on the same
> machine, which is done to give a working setup after installation. The
> package is not likely to be used in this configuration in any
> productive environment. ssh is one of the
Marc Haber writes:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:52:26AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think it's perfectly acceptable to have an admin drop data into a
>> /var/lib directory for non-default configurations of packages.
> Is this documented in policy?
> Greetings
> Marc, really reluctant to spe
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:52:26AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think it's perfectly acceptable to have an admin drop data into a
> /var/lib directory for non-default configurations of packages.
Is this documented in policy?
Greetings
Marc, really reluctant to spend days to change a package in
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:29:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> Ah, okay. For that use case, the only thing that you would care about the
> >> user home directory containing is the authorized_keys file, c
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Oh, right, for the client. Yes, yes.
>> Well, personally I would not consider either the client's key or the
>> known_hosts file to be configuration files.
> In some common situation, the known_hosts is c
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:29:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> Ah, okay. For that use case, the only thing that you would care about the
> >> user home directory containing is the authorized_keys file, c
Marc Haber writes:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:29:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Ah, okay. For that use case, the only thing that you would care about the
>> user home directory containing is the authorized_keys file, correct?
> known_hosts and the key itself.
Oh, right, for the client.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:29:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:50:37AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I'm not sure that I understand the use case. I've never needed to
> >> create an authorized_keys file for a system account created by a
> >>
8 matches
Mail list logo
