On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:08:24AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> It would; I just don't think invoke-rc.d is the right place for that
> >>> complexity to live. For instance: if upstart is running, there's an
> >>> upstart job for foo, job foo is not running, and invoke-rc.d calls
> >>> /etc/in
Le Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> - When policy 10.1 refers to maintainers reporting naming conflicts to
> debian-devel and trying to find consensus about which program is to
> be renamed, is that consensus among the maintainers of the packages
> involve
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:51:30AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> IMHO, /usr/bin/node is much too generic a name to be in any package.
>
Too generic or not, /usr/sbin/node has been in Debian since at least 1999
(13 or so years now).
I'm also sure there are many other projects using similarly
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Hello everybody,
I just figured out that Defconf's escape capability is not mentionned in the
spec. Here is a small patch to correct this.
Have a nice day,
>From 83e3ca9d76659b81b7f3f14de315b69b57dc868c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Plessy
Dat
On 03/05/2012 11:51, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:20:47PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>
Policy also states that different packages must not install commands
with diff
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:20:47PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> Policy also states that different packages must not install commands
> >> with different functionality with the same name.
> >
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
