On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:29:17AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
>
> Le 4/27/12 11:01 AM, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> > Dear Russ, Joey, Debian Med team and evrybody,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > As proposed in 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/190753#98), I would like to ask
> > the
> > Technical Comittee t
Charles Plessy wrote:
> As proposed in 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/190753#98), I would like to ask
> the
> Technical Comittee to reconsider our Policy, and restrict it to cases where
> the
> name of a program is an interface (http://bugs.debian.org/190753#128).
Actually, my message http://bugs.
Bill Allombert writes:
> 5. No detailed design work.
> The Technical Committee does not engage in design of new proposals
> and policies. Such design work should be carried out by individuals
> privately or together and discussed in ordinary technical policy
> and design fo
Bill Allombert writes:
> The constitution does not grant the tech commitee the authority to
> override the policy process.
Hm, I don't believe that's the case. Constitution 6.1.1 explicitly says:
The Technical Committee may:
1. Decide on any matter of technical policy.
This includes
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:31:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
G
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:01:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > Dear Russ, Joey, Debian Med team and evrybody,
>
> > > As proposed in 2010 (http://bugs.debi
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:01:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Dear Russ, Joey, Debian Med team and evrybody,
> > As proposed in 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/190753#98), I would like to ask
> > the
> > Technical Comittee to re
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:01:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Russ, Joey, Debian Med team and evrybody,
>
> As proposed in 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/190753#98), I would like to ask
> the
> Technical Comittee to reconsider our Policy, and restrict it to cases where
> the
> name of a p
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 18:01:52 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> I would like to know people's feeling about this.
> Seeing how you're about the only one in favour of removing the policy
> should, I'm not sure why you think raising it to tech-ctte will change
> that.
I'
* Charles Plessy [120426 02:08]:
> Thanks for the information, I thought it was obsoleted when the closing of
> bugs
> became versionned.
Before closing become versioned, the situation was more complex:
Before, a upload of a .changes would behave differently depending
whether it was a NMU or
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 18:01:52 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would like to know people's feeling about this.
>
Seeing how you're about the only one in favour of removing the policy
should, I'm not sure why you think raising it to tech-ctte will change
that.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:01:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Russ, Joey, Debian Med team and evrybody,
> Much has been said, and I am not criticizing the points that have been made
> in favor of renaming, nor I object to promote them to the developers at the
> moment where they chose a na
Dear Russ, Joey, Debian Med team and evrybody,
in 2010 I discussed with you in this bug (#190753) about our policy of removing
suffixes from program names, and the harm it causes by breaking compatibilty
between Debian system using packaged programs, and other UNIX system which
installed the progr
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Clearly I'm not the person to convince others to add multiarch tupples
> to their specs.
I don't see why or why not. But it isn't really about convincing ---
I'd be hard pressed to find someone who _doesn't_ want this stuff
documented better.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Ian Jackson writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes ("Re: Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not
> documented/defined"):
>> It is a bug in Debian: The multiarch tuples are not documented/defined
>> in Debian.
>
> They are now documented on the wiki, as previously noted in this
> thread.
>
>> The bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 190753
Bug #190753 {Done: Russ Allbery } [debian-policy] [AMENDMENT
12/04/2004] frown on programs in PATH with language extentions
Unarchived Bug 190753
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1
15 matches
Mail list logo
