Accepted:
debian-policy_3.9.3.1.dsc
to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.3.1.dsc
debian-policy_3.9.3.1.tar.gz
to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.3.1.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.9.3.1_all.deb
to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.3.1_all.deb
Changes:
debian-policy (3.9.3.1) uns
debian-policy_3.9.3.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-policy_3.9.3.1.dsc
debian-policy_3.9.3.1.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.9.3.1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661412: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #661412,
regarding debian-policy: Policy 5.4 links to Appendix D
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658009: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #658009,
regarding debian-policy: dpkg-buildpackage -rroot-command out of date
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#647645: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #647645,
regarding debian-policy: §5.1 is slightly ambiguous on space
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#647645: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #647645,
regarding section 5.1: more precise reference to ASCII characters
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#638060: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #638060,
regarding debian-policy: §9.1.1: FHS should also be a "must" for generated files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#622263: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #622263,
regarding debian-policy: Phrasing of 5.6.25 (DMUA) is confusing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601839: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601839,
regarding debian-policy: please clarify section 4.9 "build-arch (optional),
build-indep (optional)"
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#490604: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #490604,
regarding debian-policy: please don't state that scripts working under dash are
'probably' policy-compliant
to be marked as done
Hi all,
the discussion on handling of system users on package removal became silent
again, let me try to summarize ...:
* To avoid reusing uids, system users created by packages should not be
removed by the package. There may be still files owned by that user (think
also about removable media,
FYI: The status of the debian-policy source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.9.2.0
Current version: 3.9.3.0
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
12 matches
Mail list logo
