Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Accepted:
debian-policy_3.9.3.0.dsc
to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.3.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.9.3.0.tar.gz
to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.3.0.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.9.3.0_all.deb
to main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.9.3.0_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
d
debian-policy_3.9.3.0_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-policy_3.9.3.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.9.3.0.tar.gz
debian-policy_3.9.3.0_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#89038: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #89038,
regarding [mime-policy] Include update-mime behavior
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658209: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #658209,
regarding [copyright-format] clarifying copyright/license requirements
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651020: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #651020,
regarding debian-policy: New sections education, introspection and metapackages
for §2.4.
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#649674: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #649674,
regarding [copyright-format] Proofreading of the examples.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#648387: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #648387,
regarding [copyright-format] English proofreading.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#646119: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #646119,
regarding '[copyright-format] Publish version version 1.0 after DEP 5 is
accepted.
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#646166: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #646166,
regarding § 2.2.1: clarify why "must not require" includes Recommends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644230: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #644230,
regarding debian-policy: Please change virtual package name for Japanese fonts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#643690: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #643690,
regarding perl policy unclear about the section for manpages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#641071: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #641071,
regarding [copyright-format] correct or add links to SPDX
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640737: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #640737,
regarding [copyright-format] Point Format URL to www.debian.org.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640735: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #640735,
regarding [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637614: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #637614,
regarding §9.10: Do not recommend to call install-docs, as it is triggered.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633797: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #633797,
regarding copyright-format: "with exception" underspecified
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#628540: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #628540,
regarding [copyright-format] URI to SPDX license list.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#627490: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #627490,
regarding debian-policy: Description field specification is ambiguous
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626779: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #626779,
regarding debian-policy: Improve Architecture field in source package (updated
to match dpkg-source)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626796: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #626796,
regarding debian-policy: Ambigous use of ‘Source package control file’.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626408: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #626408,
regarding debian-policy: Typo in upgrading-checklist: s/url/usr/
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626408: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #626408,
regarding debian-policy: Typo in upgrading-checklist.txt: /url/lib -> /usr/lib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626338: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #626338,
regarding debian-policy: Clarification of 10.5 symlink wording
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#623050: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #623050,
regarding debian-policy: [DEP5] URI to EFL license points to EPL
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#621479: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #621479,
regarding debian-policy: retire legacy Motif policy (11.8.8)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620870: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #620870,
regarding debian-policy: /run not explained in FHS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620870: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #620870,
regarding Require support for temporary /var/run/ and /var/lock in all packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620870: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #620870,
regarding debian-policy: Please add /run as FHS exception
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#619275: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #619275,
regarding Perl Policy change to document major version upgrade trigger
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#617516: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #617516,
regarding debian-policy: Clarification that what needs to be
machine-extractable is the copyright file, not its contents.
to be
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#617315: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #617315,
regarding Don't fail /usr/local directory creation if chown fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#609162: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #609162,
regarding package names with dots/periods ('.') and crontab files: packagers
beware
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#593533: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #593533,
regarding debian-policy: Proposal to stop requesting to list initial Debian
maintainers in debian/copyright
to be marked as done
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#578421: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #578421,
regarding virtual-packages: Retire java-compiler, java2-compiler and
java-virtual-machine
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#532120: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #532120,
regarding debian-policy: Please add /run as FHS exception
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#532120: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #532120,
regarding debian-policy: /run not explained in FHS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#532120: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #532120,
regarding Require support for temporary /var/run/ and /var/lock in all packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#498300: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #498300,
regarding specify that architecture-specific dependencies must have a non-empty
list of architectures
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#23712: fixed in debian-policy 3.9.3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #23712,
regarding conflicting packages with the same conffile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Francois Mescam wrote:
> I discover recently the directory /run on my system under wheezy and on a
> system under squeeze this directory does not exist.
>
> I search information about /run in the FHS but I does not see anything about
> this directory.
It'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Francois Mescam writes:
> I discover recently the directory /run on my system under wheezy and on
> a system under squeeze this directory does not exist.
> I search information about /run in the FHS but I does not see anything
> about this directory.
Yeah, this will be corrected in Policy 3.9.3
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:09:15AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> > There's more than just my /usr. This system runs off a 160GB SSD, so
> > 500MB is more like 0.5% of the available storage space here.
>
> > 160GB is in the low end of the available storage of modern systems, and
> > probably (gu
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I discover recently the directory /run on my system under wheezy and on a
system under squeeze this directory does not exist.
I search information about /run in the FHS but I does not see anything about
this directory.
With my best regard
45 matches
Mail list logo
