Processed: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 641153 ...

2011-12-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org). > limit package debian-policy Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy' Limit currently set to '

Bug#641153: document Built-Using field for binary packages

2011-12-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > here is a proposed patch that uses a slimed version of the paragraphs > proposed by Russ (quoted below) and keeps the original examples. It > documents the field as new section, number 7.8, the last one of its > chapter, because it introduces a new type of relationship,

Bug#641153: document Built-Using field for binary packages

2011-12-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Ansgar Burchardt writes: > I think source packages better reflect the meaning of the field (keep > the source available). Listing them will hopefully soon no longer be > more complicated than binary package, see [1]. > [1] > In addition listing binaries would

Re: Bug#649811: Publication of copyright-format 1.0, a.k.a DEP 5 (after it is accepted).

2011-12-30 Thread David Prévot
Le 26/12/2011 22:19, David Prévot a écrit : > Le 26/11/2011 03:27, Charles Plessy a écrit : >> For the text version, I am not sure how necessary it is. >> […] not distributing [the text version] at all [is] also valid option > CCing debian-policy, in case someone has an opinion about it. I just

Bug#641153: document Built-Using field for binary packages

2011-12-30 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Russ Allbery writes: > Ansgar Burchardt writes: >> A try at this: > >> Some binary packages incorporate material derived from source >> or compiled code derived from other source packages. In this case >> this field must be used to list all other source packages necessary >> to obta

Bug#641153: document Built-Using field for binary packages

2011-12-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Charles Plessy , 2011-12-30, 15:39: + A Build-Using field must list the corresponding source + package for any such binary package incorporated during the build s/Build-/Built-/ + The archive software might reject packages that refer to + non-existant sou

Bug#641153: document Built-Using field for binary packages

2011-12-30 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, here is a proposed patch that uses a slimed version of the paragraphs proposed by Russ (quoted below) and keeps the original examples. It documents the field as new section, number 7.8, the last one of its chapter, because it introduces a new type of relationship, from binary package to