Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Charles Plessy
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org usertags 636383 normative discussion thanks Le Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:29:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > > The current wording implies that installing a > non-public library directly under > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ > > is fine, which is

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Charles Plessy wrote: > Would you or somebody eles mind if I close this bug report ? I would mind. The current wording implies that installing a non-public library directly under /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ is fine, which is clearly wrong. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:07:40PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode a écrit : > > Policy 10.2 states: > "Shared object files (often .so files) that are not public libraries, > that is, they are not meant to be linked to by third party executables > (binaries of other packages), should be installed in