Le Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 09:52:57PM -0600, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:55:20AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > According to apt-file, prohibiting to install files into /lib64 and
> > /usr/lib64
> > on amd64 would make only one package RC-buggy, juffed, in its experimen
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:55:20AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 04:28:41PM -0500, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:58:02PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 13:49:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is a patch.
> According
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> this summer you have submitted a bug against the Debian policy, about “what
> the
> license information in the copyright file actually means”. After reading
> again
> the whole discussion, my feeling is that much of the answer would be actually
> be given by
Dear Nicholas,
this summer you have submitted a bug against the Debian policy, about “what the
license information in the copyright file actually means”. After reading again
the whole discussion, my feeling is that much of the answer would be actually
be given by a resolution of http://bugs.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-policy@lists.debian.org (was ple...@debian.org).
> tag 630174 + patch
Bug #630174 [debian-policy] debian-policy: forbid installation into /lib64
Added tag(s) patch.
> usertags 630174 + nor
user debian-policy@lists.debian.org
tag 630174 + patch
usertags 630174 + normative
thanks
Le Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 04:28:41PM -0500, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:58:02PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 13:49:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > > Cu
Dear Policy maintainers,
the 3.9.2 release happened last April, and since then 9 bugs were closed, about
syntax of control files, japanese fonts, the machine-readable copyright file
format, and the Perl and Motif policies.
I wonder what is the timeline for a 3.9.3 release. I of course have DEP 5
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> It's always interesting to look at build logs, or to receive bug reports of
> the form
>
> CC
>
>
> or
>
> CCLD
>
>
> without knowing how the compiler or the linker were called. Maybe it is
> convenient for a package maintainer watching the build s
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.1.2
Severity: wishlist
Symptom
~~~
I just installed libjs-mathjax. According to its Installed-Size this
would just consume 16512KB. Now according to policy this is just an
estimate of course. But how accurate is it actually? So I installed said
package on ext3. Turn
9 matches
Mail list logo
