On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 at 18:01:42 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> how about a repository of ready-made stand-alone license paragraphs ?
Perhaps, but be careful with that sort of thing: it may *look* like your
package's license, but is it actually the same text?
For a long "named" license like the GP
Le Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:46:32AM +0100, Ximin Luo a écrit :
>
> That would be really really ugly pointless code and I'm not going to do that.
> Much easier to cp $LICENSE and cat $LICENSE.
Hi all,
how about a repository of ready-made stand-alone license paragraphs ? This
could be easily set u
On 01/09/11 07:15, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> Ximin Luo writes:
>
>> At the cost of some complexity in code, we can eliminate a lot of
>> complexity in our data.
>
> There is redundancy, yes. Is that what you're calling complexity? Or is
> there some significant complexity in the data of the ‘debian
3 matches
Mail list logo
